skaikrubell:

Well, I may not need Superman to be a hero, but I will always need you.

Look, if she is mad at you ‘cause she thinks that you’re not looking after me, then tell her the truth. That your entire career, everything you’ve ever done in your life, it’s all been to protect me.

maxoliness:

I may not need Superman to be a hero, but I will always need you

gehayi:

seananmcguire:

actuallyclintbarton:

gunpowderandspark:

I’m seeing a thinkpiece on why Jessica Jones will beat Supergirl and, like…

*Grabs Megaphone*

Women are not subject to the rules of Highlander! There can be more than one female-led superhero show! They can serve different demographics and interests! Stop pitting all women against each other in some sick, subtly sexist Battle Royale!

*puts down Megaphone*

*picks up Megaphone*

Did anyone lose a Megaphone? I found this one and it has the name Brittany on it but I’m not Brittany, so like…

I find this especially idiotic because it’s not like they’re competing for ratings since Jess Jones is a fucking Netflix show that can be watched literally whenever and however people want. It’s not like people have to choose between them or anything.

“There’s a second female-led superhero show with powers.”

“Well, shit.  Pack it up, we’re going home.”

“What’s going to replace us?”

“They’ve already greenlit a new show about the manly pain that can only be felt by able-bodied straight white men as they make their manly way through a conflicted world.”

“…shit.  We never stood a chance.”

You would think that any competent show runner would look at the popularity of a similar show and think, “Wow, there’s really a market for shows with female superheroes! We need to stress what the two shows have in common in our ads!” Not “People like that show a lot, even though ours been around for four whole weeks longer. Clearly no one could like both! We will never acquire a bigger audience. We should give up right now!”

adampascalfan:

brianwilly:

To be honest, Supergirl is very – procedurally, formulaically, narratively, thematically – similar to The Flash.  Both shows are made from much of the same Stuff, both contain very similar storylines and methods, both have a lot of the same draws like their humor and characterization.  On the downside, both also tend to have a lot of the same drawbacks, like the periodic awkward dialogue and generally being about as subtle as a three-year old’s crayon drawings.

About the only major difference I can name is that Supergirl frequently lampshades its own status as a female-led superhero show, and all the double standards that come with such.  And I get the impression that this often annoys a lot of viewers.  Folks rag on how blatantly “meta” the show’s messages are, how
“Supergirl,” both the show and the character, is constantly complaining about having to prove herself in
ways others don’t and working twice as hard to be taken seriously.

But
the fact is…that’s kinda exactly what’s happening.  Already this show
has been blasted a lot for things that I know others would get a pass on.  The more similar that Supergirl is to The Flash – and it’s very similar – the more evident the double standard becomes.

People rag on Supergirl’s focus on romantic subplots and love triangles and relationship drama, calling it girly and forced.  But shall we measure the amount of air-time that has been devoted to Barry Allen’s love life? ‘Cuz that’s not gonna be a small amount either.  It may very well even surpass the amount of romantic focus Kara has had in the equivalent amount of time.  But no one would ever call The Flash a girly show for all its requisite CW drama.

People complain about Kara being a soft character, how she’s constantly belittled at work and isn’t able to do her job well without her male co-workers stepping in, and can’t beat bad guys without someone else having to help her.  They complain about her not being badass enough on her own, that she’s too vulnerable.  Too girly.

And it’s like…the first five minutes of The Flash features Barry getting reamed out by his boss and needing a co-worker to cover his ass. “Captain Singh chews out Barry for something inconsequential” becomes a running gag for the rest of the season.  And how many pep talks, per episode, does Barry Allen receive from every single man, woman, and child on the cast of the Flash
before he’s able to bring down the meta of the week?  How many times has
he stammered some variation of the phrase “I can’t do it!” “I’m just
not fast enough!” “I’m failing you, dad!” “I’m failing you, mom!”
leading to [rolls six-sided die with supporting cast’s faces printed on
the sides] to have to talk him through whatever Flash-related
challenge he’s faced with this Tuesday on his earpiece?

It reminds me a lot, frankly, of the flak Black Widow receives whenever she displays some kind of vulnerability or fear in her appearances.  Never mind that every single one of her male counterparts have filled up entire films’ worth of screentime of them being vulnerable and frightened and sad.

It’s not just centered on Kara, either.  The latest episode featured General Sam Lane, who’s pretty much just a stock stereotypical military antagonist who spews nonsensical military bullshit ad nauseam, and folks are already complaining about him being a poorly-written nonsense character.  Which may be all well and good, but where was this disdain when General Eiling – who’s even more cartoonish and nonsensical than Lane is – or even Amanda Waller were spewing nonsensical military bullshit ad nauseam on The Flash and Arrow?  How come with them it’s all “Ooh iconic DC Comics characters are appearing on my TV screens!!!” and with Lane it’s all “This makes no sense and it is bad for not making sense”?

This show really is held to different standards on a constant basis, on nearly every aspect.  I mean…folks don’t have to like it if they don’t like it, but they can’t possibly claim that they’re not taking it to task for things they wouldn’t even think twice about on other shows.